Correction: In accordance with the data in the S-1, we reported the purchase price as $113 million. Following the publication of the original article last week, a Conductor shareholder reached out to me to offer some factual corrections that weren’t made clear in the S-1.
$126 million (plus earnout). The Conductor deal, it turns out, was done for a total value of $126 million, roughly $98 million of which was in stock. There was also an undisclosed earnout that was “substantial,” although the precise figure was not provided to us. Conductor raised roughly $60 million. That compares to independent SEO firm BrightEdge which has raised nearly $62 million.
Here’s an excerpt discussing the acquisition from the WeWork S-1 filing:
In March 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the equity of Conductor, Inc. (“Conductor”) for a total consideration of $113.6million. The total consideration included $15.8million in cash and $97.8million in SeriesAP-1Preferred Stock. As of December31, 2018, $0.2million of cash and $10.0million of the SeriesAP-1Preferred Stock that were held back at closing remain included in other current liabilities and additional paid in capital, respectively on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of June30, 2019, all holdbacks have been released and the Company received $0.2million as a purchase price reduction, which was recorded as a measurement period adjustment to goodwill. Conductor was founded in 2006 and is a marketing services software company that provides search engine optimization and enterprise content marketing solutions.
A ‘big win’ — depends on your POV. When the Conductor deal was announced, Conductor CEO Seth Besmertnik said it was a “huge win for the entire industry.” That depends on your perspective.
The vision for Conductor is to offer its SEO and other services to WeWork’s enterprise customers. In addition, Conductor will also provide marketing education through the Flatiron School, another WeWork acquisition.
Investor appetite unclear. The We company’s valuation was roughly $47 billion in January. The S-1 reveals that it has a $3 billion annual run-rate. This sky-high valuation compared with revenues, together with some of the strange We Company disclosures, has led to unflattering headlines such as “WeWork’s IPO would be a bewildering way to waste your money.”
Still, the mostly stock transaction could pay off nicely for Conductor. We’ll have to see what investors’ appetite is for The We Company.
Uber, the most recent tech-company IPO, has had a tough time so far, with investors now deeply skeptical about the long-term outlook for the company. Uber’s performance could dampen demand for We, especially in the larger context of fears of a coming recession.
Why we should care. For Conductor customers, not much is likely to change in the near term. The company has been operating under We’s ownership for months now, and it’slikelysuch a small part of We’s sales and earnings it’s not likely to get much mindshare from the mothership. That means Conductor’s leadership, led by CEO SethBesmertnik, will likely be left to run the company with little interference.
The SEO industry has multiple companies seeking to be acquired or exit in the next few years. Conductor’s acquisition price could establish a benchmark that would-be buyers use to value other companies. While the acquisition price is greater than what the S-1 reflects and what we originally reported, it is lower than what some investors were probably hoping for.